The AI Buyer Intelligence Sprint
ARM helps high-ACV B2B teams identify the buyer conversations, source gaps, and proof failures that make an otherwise strong company harder to trust during research and evaluation.
15 BUSINESS DAYS · $12,500 FIXED SCOPE · NO RANKING OR REVENUE GUARANTEES
The commercial problem
They have already compared vendors, read reviews, evaluated implementation risk, and asked whether your product is credible for their environment. The question is whether the evidence they encounter makes the next step easier—or harder.
Category coverage, comparison pages, third-party proof, technical documentation, review surfaces, and communities influence which companies feel credible enough to evaluate.
When deployment, security, integrations, ROI, or vertical relevance cannot be verified quickly, the buyer carries doubt into the evaluation and the AE is forced to repair it.
A dashboard can surface an account, topic, or engagement change. It usually cannot show which buyer question matters, what evidence supports the interpretation, who should act, or how the response will be reviewed.
Not another dashboard
The Sprint is designed to produce a shared commercial action record, not another opaque score or unowned alert.
The product
The AI Buyer Intelligence Sprint is for a company with a real commercial trigger, defined competitors, and people who can act on the findings. We map the conversation before we recommend the work.
What the work looks like
Every priority conclusion is tied to a documented observation, a relevant buyer question, and a person who can change the condition. These are illustrative excerpts in ARM's format, not client data.
How the sprint runs
We lock the business trigger, buyer, category, competitors, proof boundary, and the commercial question that needs an answer.
Buyer voice, sales evidence, and category behavior become a limited question set—not an unlimited prompt list.
We document observed conditions, source patterns, owned proof surfaces, conflicts, and the buyer validation path.
Leadership receives five to eight decisions with owners, dependencies, acceptance tests, and a 90-day measurement plan.
Start with a real question
Share your category, buyer, trigger, and competitors. We will assess whether a full Sprint is justified—not send you an automated score.
Frequently asked
No. Third-party systems vary by context, time, location, model, and user. ARM documents agreed observation conditions and focuses on the evidence, proof, and conversion surfaces the company can actually govern.
A fit has a high-value B2B sale, a defined category and competitor set, a material trigger in the next 180 days, usable buyer or pipeline evidence, an executive sponsor, and owners able to act within 90 days.
The executive team decides whether its internal owners can execute the action register, whether a discrete proof-surface project is appropriate, or whether a three-month activation cadence is justified. ARM does not force a retainer where the evidence does not support one.
It is a short human-reviewed fit assessment built around three buyer conversations and the prospect’s current trigger. It is not a public score, a free audit, or a promise to diagnose every condition before scope is agreed.
A single undocumented proof gap in a $75,000+ evaluation is expensive to carry into a live deal. The Sprint is priced to cost less than that risk to leave unresolved—not to guarantee it disappears.